It saves money, saves lives, expands access, and improves choice, all while preserving (or even improving) quality of care — Introduction Opponents of Medicare-for-All have generally based their opposition on a number of claims relating to cost, quality, and choice. They claim that it would be too pricey, that it would result in inferior care, and it would eliminate people’s ability to choose their doctors. Fortunately for proponents of single-payer, these…